May Community Call #26903
Replies: 2 comments 5 replies
-
|
Coming from Deprecation of MSI and EXE based installers in lieu of MSIX #27292 Was suggested to Add here In regards of the MSI/MSIX deprecation My first few concerns, Microsoft/Powershell team need to provide clarifications on
Seems reasonable for discussion in the community call |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I'd like a serious discussion about Microsoft's unilateral decision to remove MSI for PowerShell. I'd like to bring back the MSI until Microsoft fixes MSIX to do all that the MSI did. That is not an unreasonable request. And it should be the community that decides. not just one stakeholder PowerShell is an open-source community project. The community should decide issues like this. Let's discuss this with the community FIRST. My view is that if Microsoft can't bring the necessary changes for MSIX NOW, then we should revert to MSIs for now and wait for Microsoft to fix MSIX. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
May 21st 16th 2026
Agenda (In progress)
7.6 release post-mortem — bring awareness to the blog post, reiterate release complexity
DSC v3.2 GA - Steve
DSC V3 for PSResourceGet - Aditya
7.7 announcement — "coming soon"
MSI deprecation announcement — bring awareness to the blog post
Mac Notarization
New article: about_Error_Handling — special thanks to Ahmed Taha (SufficientDaikon) for the contribution, updated related articles to standardize terminology (non-terminating vs. statement-terminating vs. script-terminating)
Demo – It's back! Plaster 2.0! - James Petty
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions